![]() And health, as I always say, is mental, emotional, physical, and nutritional, so to keep all of that in mind. I get to do this every week and talk to you about really important health topics. And as always, super duper excited to get to come to you live. SEE BELOW FOR THE FULL TRANSCRIPT OR CLICK THE IMAGE ABOVE FOR THE VIDEO RECORDING: ![]() This video will be posted to Aimee’s channels to educate and inspire others on the fertility journey. Raupp, M.S., L.Ac and Aimee Raupp Wellness & Fertility Centers and all personnel associated with the practice do not use social media to convey medical advice. I have been a practitioner of Traditional Chinese Medicine for over 17 years and I will be speaking from my clinical experience helping thousands of women conceive. In this video, I talk about how to test AND how to reduce your biological age!ĭisclaimer: Please keep in mind that I am not a medical doctor. While you can’t stop time from marching on, you CAN support your body through that process and can be healthier as you get older. There’s a common misconception that as we get older we MUST decline in all areas but that simply isn’t true. What really and truly matters is your biological age (meaning how healthy the cells in your body are)! Swipe through the photos for an explanation of what that is and how we test it. I always say that age is NOT the biggest factor when it comes to fertility and what I mean by that is your chronological age, the number of birthdays you’ve had. © The Author(s) 2019.My biological age is 7-10 years YOUNGER than my chronological age! (depending on which test we look at) INCREDIBLE! Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. The overall net reclassification improvement was 0.30 (P < 0.001).Įstimated age based on exercise stress testing performance is a better predictor of mortality when compared to chronological age.Įxercise age exercise stress testing mortality. When comparing prediction models using A-BEST versus chronological age, a significant increase in the area under the curve was demonstrated if A-BEST was used (0.82 vs. After adjustment for clinical comorbidities, higher metabolic equivalents of task (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for mortality 0.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70-0.72, P < 0.001) and higher chronotropic reserve index (adjusted HR for mortality 0.97, 95% CI 0.96-0.99, P = 0.0135) were associated with improved survival, whereas abnormal heart rate recovery (adjusted HR for mortality 1.53, 95% CI 1.46-1.61, P < 0.001) and higher A-BEST (adjusted HR for mortality 1.05, 95% CI 1.04-1.05, P < 0.001) were associated with higher mortality. At follow-up (mean duration was 8.7 years), 9929 (8%) died. Mean age was 53.5 ± 12.6 years and 59% were men. Improvement in predicting mortality using A-BEST compared to chronological age was evaluated with the use of net reclassification improvement and C statistic. Uni and multivariable Cox models were used to determine the association of A-BEST with mortality. Estimated age was computed based on exercise capacity (number of peak estimated metabolic equivalents of task), chronotropic reserve index and heart rate recovery, taking into account patient's gender and medications that affect heart rate. We included 126,356 consecutive patients referred for exercise (electrocardiography, echocardiography or myocardial perfusion imaging) stress testing at our institution from January 1st, 1991 to February 27th, 2015. We sought to estimate patients' age based on their stress testing exercise performance (A-BEST), and evaluate whether A-BEST would be a better predictor of mortality when compared to chronological age.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |